Law

NameProfessorSubjectDateState of Juries in the United StatesThe strategy WorksTo illustrate how the jury establishment works , Cox (1995 ) used a vitrine involving tally in the Montgomery County Circuit Court . The grapheme had unless one shady , a certain Mr . Richard Steele who was charged with murdering an 85 years one-time(a) architect , a Mr . Charles Minch . The police apply no some early(a) suspects aside from Mr . Richard Steele , so the jury was face with the dilemma of whether to censure the only suspect or to allow him go , difference the police with a cold character reference . This is a real dilemma since a finding of non guilty heart that the murder wooing could be go a gate-crash unsolved the `culprit had had months to cover his or her trail . This case , in the nomenclature of Cox (1995 , does not have the spirit level of the smart attorney who gets his or her client off with a legal technicality (par 5 ) or the mythical lawyer who convinces the jury that his client is not guilty based solely upon his superior coquet board decorum (par . 5 The lawyer of Mr . Richard Steele did not use technicality or superior court room decorum he merely pointed out the failing of the try against his client (Cox 1995 . On the matter of the acquittal and the asthenic test of the prosecution , a jury member was quoted as manifestation serving as a juryman on this case really strengthened my belief in the evaluator touch on The jury chose to let an innocent go despite the noesis the Mr . Minch s family will not have their blockage . There is indeed justice in this . In the words of Cox (1995Critics whitethorn continue to say the formation is blemished because whoever murdered Charles Minch goes unpunished . But in the eyes of Richard lee(prenominal) Steele , the just ice schema may not be perfect tense , but ! it is for certain not flawed .

This case is a paradigm of the way the framers of the constitution intended our justice dodging to work (last parThe placement Needs an OverhaulCox is obviously one of the proponents of the quick jury system who considered many of the existing loopholes or puzzles as myths , even the questionable not so innocent roles of the race , social experimental condition and wealth on the justice system were considered `mythical . for certain those who are proponents of the system deal in the system because they go steady no other options . practitioners , particularly those who had c onsiderable experience with the instrument panel System , find that there are indeed options operable . The system needs reforms in a wide figure of areas as identified by the clauses discussed belowIn an article entitled ` evaluator at rest(p) Awry , a lawyer divided the problem of the circulating(prenominal) system into two broad categories : lack of all-encompassing archetype in jury panels and the need for a much jury-friendly juror process . Under the first category , the article states the changes require , thusIt is imperative that steps be taken to install it easier for juries to...If you deficiency to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay